Secondary Corrections of the Orbit



Secondary Corrections of the Orbit




Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 2021-03-01, Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 129-137, Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc.



Key points

  • Late and secondary orbital reconstructions are more demanding than primary reconstructions due to altered anatomic landmarks and late soft tissue changes—so the ultimate objective should be an adequate primary reconstruction.

  • Computer-assisted planning/surgery in combination with intraoperative navigation and/or imaging improve postoperative results.

  • Most common indications for secondary orbital reconstructions are globe malposition, binocular diplopia, and impaired eye motility.


Introduction: nature of the problem

Secondary orbital reconstructions mostly affect defects in the area of the orbital floor or the medial wall, because these structures are most susceptible to fractures due to fragility. These defects may cause an increase of the orbital volume and a dislocation of the orbital content; furthermore, an altered globe position may arise ( Fig. 1 ). Clinically, enophthalmos and/or hypoglobus develops ( Figs. 2 and 3 ). As part of primary trauma diagnostics, swelling of the soft tissue in the affected eye socket may compensate this increase in volume for a short time. Even supposedly objective methods such as Hertel or Naugle ophthalmometry are not helpful because the bony structures are not sufficiently taken into account in those cases. In cases where a volume-relevant defect is not treated surgically and swelling has subsided, the bulb can be dislocated permanently and associated complaints may arise. In addition to an aesthetically noticeable asymmetry, functional restrictions are particularly stressful for the patients. These restrictions range from binocular diplopia to motility restrictions and may have a significant impact on everyday quality of life. Such symptoms may be more apparent in insufficiently reconstructed orbits than in fractured orbits with no treatment at all ( Fig. 4 ). This finding is due to more pronounced scarring in previously operated orbits on one hand, on the other hand to foreign material, that has to be removed during secondary orbital reconstruction, and this may complicate the further outcome. The ultimate goal of any reconstruction, primary or secondary, must therefore be to restore the original aesthetic and functional situation as good as possible by means of accurate preoperative diagnostics and planning.

Coronal ( A ) and sagittal ( B ) view of an orbital 2-wall fracture before primary reconstruction.
Fig. 1
Coronal (
A ) and sagittal (
B ) view of an orbital 2-wall fracture before primary reconstruction.

Frontal view of insufficient reconstructed left orbit. Impaired eye motility, binocular diplopia, and a globe malposition are found. Naugle and Hertel ophthalmometry shows an enophthalmos of 3 mm.
Fig. 2
Frontal view of insufficient reconstructed left orbit. Impaired eye motility, binocular diplopia, and a globe malposition are found. Naugle and Hertel ophthalmometry shows an enophthalmos of 3 mm.

Bottom view of insufficient reconstructed left orbit. A distinct enophthalmos is found.
Fig. 3
Bottom view of insufficient reconstructed left orbit. A distinct enophthalmos is found.

Coronal ( A ) and sagittal ( B ) view of an orbital 2-wall fracture after insufficient primary reconstruction.
Fig. 4
Coronal (
A ) and sagittal (
B ) view of an orbital 2-wall fracture after insufficient primary reconstruction.


Surgical technique


Preoperative planning

A thorough patient history including the initial trauma and all previous surgeries, as well as physical examination has to be conducted with special focus on visual acuity, pupil function, eye motility, and binocular diplopia. Even though major eye injuries are seldom, an interdisciplinary examination by an ophthalmologist is recommended also for medicolegal reasons. The position of the bulb is assessed using a Naugle or Hertel ophthalmometry and photo documentation. Current indications for secondary orbital corrections are enophthalmos larger than 2 mm and persistent diplopia due to possible tissue entrapment. Optimal timing for the procedure depends on the specific case, but 3 to 6 months after primary reconstruction or trauma is favored by most surgeons. For preoperative planning a three-dimensional (3D) imaging for evaluation of the bony boundary and the orbital soft tissue situation is mandatory. Computed tomography with contrast medium and a layer thickness of less than 1 mm is recommended. Because of the lack of soft tissue resolution, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) alone often does not provide sufficient information. The same applies to MRI for the bony boundary. The 3D imaging and the clinical findings facilitate a precise planning of the further procedure.

A recent 3D data set can therefore be used as the basis for further planning. The planning is basically identical to that of a primary orbital reconstruction. Assuming the symmetry of the midface, the orbital shape of the unaffected side is used. Using a mirroring function of the planning software, this object serves as a template for the virtual reconstruction of the fractured orbit. In primary reconstruction cases, a simple mirroring is usually sufficient. The requirements for patient-specific implants are also similar to those of primary cases: round edges, radiologic visibility, inert material, and reconstruction of significant anatomic areas (ie, posterior ledge, transition zone). The bony frame may be reconstructed in the same shape as before the trauma with the help of determining the orbital volumes based on the bony boundaries, which works well in primary orbital trauma repair. In the case of secondary reconstructions, additional overcorrections of the orbital volume may be necessary due to posttraumatic or postsurgical fat tissue atrophy or increase of the bony orbit (eg, additional roof fracture or loss of lateral wall). The amount of overcorrection has to be estimated individually for each patient and fracture pattern, hence up to now no conclusive literature is available on this matter ( Fig. 5 ). The same applies to imported foreign material. The scope of such an additional virtual volume correction may unfortunately only be determined objectively to a limited extent by volume measurement and still requires a solid experience of the operating surgeon. Ultimately, the goal of preoperative planning is the construction of a virtual model of the orbit, which matches the clinical situation. This virtual model is then the basis for 3D-printing patient-specific biomodels or, ideally, manufacturing patient-specific implants. Many surgeons prefer titanium as standard material due to its biological and technical characteristics (ie, inert, dimensionally stable, radiopacity). The preoperative virtual planning may also be used intraoperatively for real-time navigation or intraoperative 3D imaging with subsequent superimposition as a quality control.

Preoperative computer-assisted planning shows in red the virtually constructed PSI superimposed on a computed tomography showing the insufficient primary orbital reconstruction. PSI, patient-specific implant.
Fig. 5
Preoperative computer-assisted planning shows in red the virtually constructed PSI superimposed on a computed tomography showing the insufficient primary orbital reconstruction. PSI, patient-specific implant.


Preparation and patient positioning

When using intraoperative navigation, only hard tissue–based registration is thought to be sufficiently exact for intraorbital navigation. A dental splint with navigational markers (eg, titanium mini screws) may be fabricated preoperatively through a dental technician. With the help of a preoperative 3D data set and the prepared splint, an exact hard tissue registration is possible without further invasive measures. Using this workflow, the most accurate radiation-free position control may be performed. Real-time intraoperative navigation is still an extremely helpful tool, especially for complex reconstructions or less-experienced surgeons.

The patient is placed supine during the procedure and intubated orally in most cases. In cases of intraoperative navigation both the oral cavity and scalp part of the head need to be disinfected in order to place the registration splint and transfixed navigation parts.

The use of a headlamp or an alternative light source tailored to the surgeon is strongly recommended.


Surgical approach

The transconjunctival retroseptal approach seems most suitable, as seldom complications occur. Incision may be done using either a scalpel or a monopolar device. If there are no contraindications, the monopolar offers the advantage of bloodless preparation in layers. In general, the best position for the surgeon is cranially to the patient giving appropriate view for most orbital areas.


Surgical procedure

The lower eyelid is held caudally using lid retractors; the bulb together with the intraorbital soft tissue is gently pulled cranially. Now the conjunctival tissue is incised. It is important to keep a sufficiently large distance from the lid edge, and an arcuate cut should be performed ( Fig. 6 ). Now the subconjunctival layer is also dissected using the monopolar needle ( Fig. 7 ). The intraorbital tissue is carefully pulled up. The eyelid retractors may now be replaced by smaller ones. The periosteum can now be identified easily and incised as well in the area of the infraorbital margin ( Fig. 8 ). Now the orbital floor or the lower parts of the medial wall may be dissected easily ( Fig. 9 ). In cases with large defects in the area of the medial wall, a transcaruncular extension of the transconjunctival approach may be necessary. This way, the entire floor and the medial orbital wall may be reached in a safe and reliable manner. After preparation of the affected region of the orbit and removal of any previously inserted foreign materials, the reconstruction is carried out. A patient-specific titanium implant allows the orbital volume to be reconstructed in a dimensionally stable manner in accordance with the preoperative planning. Intraoperative navigation offers a radiation-free and real-time technique for quality control. For this purpose, a transfixed navigation star is attached to the scalp and the 3D position of the patient in the room is registered by means of the aforementioned dental splint. This way, a continuous comparison with the virtual planning may already take place during the reconstruction process ( Fig. 10 ). The correct position is first checked clinically. If this seems reasonable, fixation is carried out with at least one osteosynthesis screw in the area of the orbital margin ( Fig. 11 ). The ultimate objective control, however, is the intraoperative 3D imaging (ie, CBCT) ( Fig. 12 ). In addition to direct evaluation of the images, superimposition with the preoperative planning allows for accurate intraoperative quality control ( Figs. 13 and 14 ). With intraoperative imaging corrections may be carried out directly during the same surgery. This way, any secondary intervention is avoided. After satisfactory reconstruction, passive eye motility is checked with the forced duction test. A visual control of the implant borders ensures that no tissue entrapment exists. After rinsing with ringer lactate, the wound is closed using Vicryl 7-0 ( Figs. 15–17 ).

Arcuate formed incision of the conjunctival tissue using a monopolar needle. The conjunctiva is stretched using lid retractors and a malleable spatula.
Fig. 6
Arcuate formed incision of the conjunctival tissue using a monopolar needle. The conjunctiva is stretched using lid retractors and a malleable spatula.

Subsequent layerwise dissection completing the transconjunctival retroseptal approach.
Fig. 7
Subsequent layerwise dissection completing the transconjunctival retroseptal approach.

Identification of the infraorbital margin and incision of the periostium after removal of intraorbital tissue.
Fig. 8
Identification of the infraorbital margin and incision of the periostium after removal of intraorbital tissue.

Dissection and reduction of herniated orbital tissue. The entire bony support area must be identifiable in order to facilitate implant placement without tissue entrapment.
Fig. 9
Dissection and reduction of herniated orbital tissue. The entire bony support area must be identifiable in order to facilitate implant placement without tissue entrapment.

Intraoperative navigation facilitates secondary orbital reconstruction, offering real-time 3D position control.
Fig. 10
Intraoperative navigation facilitates secondary orbital reconstruction, offering real-time 3D position control.

Implant fixation with mini screws. A forced duction test has to be performed in order to ensure free eye motility. The implant borders have to be visually checked, that there is no tissue entrapment.
Fig. 11
Implant fixation with mini screws. A forced duction test has to be performed in order to ensure free eye motility. The implant borders have to be visually checked, that there is no tissue entrapment.

Intraoperative 3D imaging (ie, CBCT) enables 3D position control of the orbital implant, and furthermore, intraoperative superimposition with the preoperative virtual planning is feasible. Plastic coverage enables instant continuation of the surgery after finishing the imaging process.
Fig. 12
Intraoperative 3D imaging (ie, CBCT) enables 3D position control of the orbital implant, and furthermore, intraoperative superimposition with the preoperative virtual planning is feasible. Plastic coverage enables instant continuation of the surgery after finishing the imaging process.

Intraoperative superimposition of the intraoperative CBCT scan with the preoperative planning shows the accuracy of the secondary orbital reconstruction. In case surgical corrections are needed this may be perfomed instantly.
Fig. 13
Intraoperative superimposition of the intraoperative CBCT scan with the preoperative planning shows the accuracy of the secondary orbital reconstruction. In case surgical corrections are needed this may be perfomed instantly.

Coronal ( A ) and sagittal ( B ) view of the intraoperative CBCT scan. Correct position of the implant can be verified.
Fig. 14
Coronal (
A ) and sagittal (
B ) view of the intraoperative CBCT scan. Correct position of the implant can be verified.

Wound closure using 7-0 sutures.
Fig. 15
Wound closure using 7-0 sutures.

Frontal view of the secondary reconstructed left orbit with an improved globe position and eye motility. A slight improvement of binocular diplopia was also achieved. Naugle ophthalmometry shows a symmetric result.
Fig. 16
Frontal view of the secondary reconstructed left orbit with an improved globe position and eye motility. A slight improvement of binocular diplopia was also achieved. Naugle ophthalmometry shows a symmetric result.

Bottom view of the secondary reconstructed left orbit with a symmetric globe position.
Fig. 17
Bottom view of the secondary reconstructed left orbit with a symmetric globe position.


Potential complications

Scarring in the lower eyelid and consecutive entropion or ectropion may occur, especially in cases with inadequate surgical approach and dissection. Another potential complication is tearing of the lower eyelid, especially in previously operated cases where scarred tissue alters the resilience of the lid. These complications are rare and can be avoided reliably, if dissection is done with sufficient care. Careful dissection is thought to prevent microtrauma to the eye muscles as well as to the orbital tissue. This way extensive fat atrophy hopefully is prevented. Sequelae as binocular diplopia are common in the postoperative inpatient phase due to swelling. Usually diplopia vanishes with decreasing swelling. Blindness of the operated eye is extremely rare and can reliably be avoided with the assistance of modern computer-assisted surgery, patient-specific implants, and sufficient caution by an experienced surgeon.


Pearls and pitfalls

Removal of previously inserted material might be challenging due to scarring. This can differ significantly depending on the used shape and type of material. Scar tissue passes through implant fenestrations and needs to be dissected sharp, which is especially challenging close to structures at risk. The investigators always test free eye motility through a Forced Duction Test before implant insertion (as comparative value) and after the insertion as ensurement that no orbital tissue is entrapped. Another challenge is the correct estimation of the orbital target volume. Patient-specific implants are thought to ensure a less traumatic orbital reconstruction, a reconstruction that is furthermore in line with preoperative planning. However, intraoperative adaptation is limited. Some studies recommend inserting autogenous bone for correction of orbital volume loss; to the authors’ experience, this type of volume contouring is not permanent due to resorption. Titanium blocks in turn may be challenging and difficult to place. In their opinion, thorough preoperative planning of a correct target volume and anatomic shape by an experienced team for planning and surgery constitutes the best solution for achieving optimal results.


You're Reading a Preview

Become a DentistryKey membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here

Was this article helpful?

Secondary Corrections of the Orbit Harald Essig PD, Dr med, Dr med dent , Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner Dr med univ, Dr med dent and Michael Blumer Dr med, Dr med dent Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 2021-03-01, Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 129-137, Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. Key points Late and secondary orbital reconstructions are more demanding than primary reconstructions due to altered anatomic landmarks and late soft tissue changes—so the ultimate objective should be an adequate primary reconstruction. Computer-assisted planning/surgery in combination with intraoperative navigation and/or imaging improve postoperative results. Most common indications for secondary orbital reconstructions are globe malposition, binocular diplopia, and impaired eye motility. Introduction: nature of the problem Secondary orbital reconstructions mostly affect defects in the area of the orbital floor or the medial wall, because these structures are most susceptible to fractures due to fragility. These defects may cause an increase of the orbital volume and a dislocation of the orbital content; furthermore, an altered globe position may arise ( Fig. 1 ). Clinically, enophthalmos and/or hypoglobus develops ( Figs. 2 and 3 ). As part of primary trauma diagnostics, swelling of the soft tissue in the affected eye socket may compensate this increase in volume for a short time. Even supposedly objective methods such as Hertel or Naugle ophthalmometry are not helpful because the bony structures are not sufficiently taken into account in those cases. In cases where a volume-relevant defect is not treated surgically and swelling has subsided, the bulb can be dislocated permanently and associated complaints may arise. In addition to an aesthetically noticeable asymmetry, functional restrictions are particularly stressful for the patients. These restrictions range from binocular diplopia to motility restrictions and may have a significant impact on everyday quality of life. Such symptoms may be more apparent in insufficiently reconstructed orbits than in fractured orbits with no treatment at all ( Fig. 4 ). This finding is due to more pronounced scarring in previously operated orbits on one hand, on the other hand to foreign material, that has to be removed during secondary orbital reconstruction, and this may complicate the further outcome. The ultimate goal of any reconstruction, primary or secondary, must therefore be to restore the original aesthetic and functional situation as good as possible by means of accurate preoperative diagnostics and planning. Fig. 1 Coronal ( A ) and sagittal ( B ) view of an orbital 2-wall fracture before primary reconstruction. Fig. 2 Frontal view of insufficient reconstructed left orbit. Impaired eye motility, binocular diplopia, and a globe malposition are found. Naugle and Hertel ophthalmometry shows an enophthalmos of 3 mm. Fig. 3 Bottom view of insufficient reconstructed left orbit. A distinct enophthalmos is found. Fig. 4 Coronal ( A ) and sagittal ( B ) view of an orbital 2-wall fracture after insufficient primary reconstruction. Surgical technique Preoperative planning A thorough patient history including the initial trauma and all previous surgeries, as well as physical examination has to be conducted with special focus on visual acuity, pupil function, eye motility, and binocular diplopia. Even though major eye injuries are seldom, an interdisciplinary examination by an ophthalmologist is recommended also for medicolegal reasons. The position of the bulb is assessed using a Naugle or Hertel ophthalmometry and photo documentation. Current indications for secondary orbital corrections are enophthalmos larger than 2 mm and persistent diplopia due to possible tissue entrapment. Optimal timing for the procedure depends on the specific case, but 3 to 6 months after primary reconstruction or trauma is favored by most surgeons. For preoperative planning a three-dimensional (3D) imaging for evaluation of the bony boundary and the orbital soft tissue situation is mandatory. Computed tomography with contrast medium and a layer thickness of less than 1 mm is recommended. Because of the lack of soft tissue resolution, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) alone often does not provide sufficient information. The same applies to MRI for the bony boundary. The 3D imaging and the clinical findings facilitate a precise planning of the further procedure. A recent 3D data set can therefore be used as the basis for further planning. The planning is basically identical to that of a primary orbital reconstruction. Assuming the symmetry of the midface, the orbital shape of the unaffected side is used. Using a mirroring function of the planning software, this object serves as a template for the virtual reconstruction of the fractured orbit. In primary reconstruction cases, a simple mirroring is usually sufficient. The requirements for patient-specific implants are also similar to those of primary cases: round edges, radiologic visibility, inert material, and reconstruction of significant anatomic areas (ie, posterior ledge, transition zone). The bony frame may be reconstructed in the same shape as before the trauma with the help of determining the orbital volumes based on the bony boundaries, which works well in primary orbital trauma repair. In the case of secondary reconstructions, additional overcorrections of the orbital volume may be necessary due to posttraumatic or postsurgical fat tissue atrophy or increase of the bony orbit (eg, additional roof fracture or loss of lateral wall). The amount of overcorrection has to be estimated individually for each patient and fracture pattern, hence up to now no conclusive literature is available on this matter ( Fig. 5 ). The same applies to imported foreign material. The scope of such an additional virtual volume correction may unfortunately only be determined objectively to a limited extent by volume measurement and still requires a solid experience of the operating surgeon. Ultimately, the goal of preoperative planning is the construction of a virtual model of the orbit, which matches the clinical situation. This virtual model is then the basis for 3D-printing patient-specific biomodels or, ideally, manufacturing patient-specific implants. Many surgeons prefer titanium as standard material due to its biological and technical characteristics (ie, inert, dimensionally stable, radiopacity). The preoperative virtual planning may also be used intraoperatively for real-time navigation or intraoperative 3D imaging with subsequent superimposition as a quality control. Fig. 5 Preoperative computer-assisted planning shows in red the virtually constructed PSI superimposed on a computed tomography showing the insufficient primary orbital reconstruction. PSI, patient-specific implant. Preparation and patient positioning When using intraoperative navigation, only hard tissue–based registration is thought to be sufficiently exact for intraorbital navigation. A dental splint with navigational markers (eg, titanium mini screws) may be fabricated preoperatively through a dental technician. With the help of a preoperative 3D data set and the prepared splint, an exact hard tissue registration is possible without further invasive measures. Using this workflow, the most accurate radiation-free position control may be performed. Real-time intraoperative navigation is still an extremely helpful tool, especially for complex reconstructions or less-experienced surgeons. The patient is placed supine during the procedure and intubated orally in most cases. In cases of intraoperative navigation both the oral cavity and scalp part of the head need to be disinfected in order to place the registration splint and transfixed navigation parts. The use of a headlamp or an alternative light source tailored to the surgeon is strongly recommended. Surgical approach The transconjunctival retroseptal approach seems most suitable, as seldom complications occur. Incision may be done using either a scalpel or a monopolar device. If there are no contraindications, the monopolar offers the advantage of bloodless preparation in layers. In general, the best position for the surgeon is cranially to the patient giving appropriate view for most orbital areas. Surgical procedure The lower eyelid is held caudally using lid retractors; the bulb together with the intraorbital soft tissue is gently pulled cranially. Now the conjunctival tissue is incised. It is important to keep a sufficiently large distance from the lid edge, and an arcuate cut should be performed ( Fig. 6 ). Now the subconjunctival layer is also dissected using the monopolar needle ( Fig. 7 ). The intraorbital tissue is carefully pulled up. The eyelid retractors may now be replaced by smaller ones. The periosteum can now be identified easily and incised as well in the area of the infraorbital margin ( Fig. 8 ). Now the orbital floor or the lower parts of the medial wall may be dissected easily ( Fig. 9 ). In cases with large defects in the area of the medial wall, a transcaruncular extension of the transconjunctival approach may be necessary. This way, the entire floor and the medial orbital wall may be reached in a safe and reliable manner. After preparation of the affected region of the orbit and removal of any previously inserted foreign materials, the reconstruction is carried out. A patient-specific titanium implant allows the orbital volume to be reconstructed in a dimensionally stable manner in accordance with the preoperative planning. Intraoperative navigation offers a radiation-free and real-time technique for quality control. For this purpose, a transfixed navigation star is attached to the scalp and the 3D position of the patient in the room is registered by means of the aforementioned dental splint. This way, a continuous comparison with the virtual planning may already take place during the reconstruction process ( Fig. 10 ). The correct position is first checked clinically. If this seems reasonable, fixation is carried out with at least one osteosynthesis screw in the area of the orbital margin ( Fig. 11 ). The ultimate objective control, however, is the intraoperative 3D imaging (ie, CBCT) ( Fig. 12 ). In addition to direct evaluation of the images, superimposition with the preoperative planning allows for accurate intraoperative quality control ( Figs. 13 and 14 ). With intraoperative imaging corrections may be carried out directly during the same surgery. This way, any secondary intervention is avoided. After satisfactory reconstruction, passive eye motility is checked with the forced duction test. A visual control of the implant borders ensures that no tissue entrapment exists. After rinsing with ringer lactate, the wound is closed using Vicryl 7-0 ( Figs. 15–17 ). Fig. 6 Arcuate formed incision of the conjunctival tissue using a monopolar needle. The conjunctiva is stretched using lid retractors and a malleable spatula. Fig. 7 Subsequent layerwise dissection completing the transconjunctival retroseptal approach. Fig. 8 Identification of the infraorbital margin and incision of the periostium after removal of intraorbital tissue. Fig. 9 Dissection and reduction of herniated orbital tissue. The entire bony support area must be identifiable in order to facilitate implant placement without tissue entrapment. Fig. 10 Intraoperative navigation facilitates secondary orbital reconstruction, offering real-time 3D position control. Fig. 11 Implant fixation with mini screws. A forced duction test has to be performed in order to ensure free eye motility. The implant borders have to be visually checked, that there is no tissue entrapment. Fig. 12 Intraoperative 3D imaging (ie, CBCT) enables 3D position control of the orbital implant, and furthermore, intraoperative superimposition with the preoperative virtual planning is feasible. Plastic coverage enables instant continuation of the surgery after finishing the imaging process. Fig. 13 Intraoperative superimposition of the intraoperative CBCT scan with the preoperative planning shows the accuracy of the secondary orbital reconstruction. In case surgical corrections are needed this may be perfomed instantly. Fig. 14 Coronal ( A ) and sagittal ( B ) view of the intraoperative CBCT scan. Correct position of the implant can be verified. Fig. 15 Wound closure using 7-0 sutures. Fig. 16 Frontal view of the secondary reconstructed left orbit with an improved globe position and eye motility. A slight improvement of binocular diplopia was also achieved. Naugle ophthalmometry shows a symmetric result. Fig. 17 Bottom view of the secondary reconstructed left orbit with a symmetric globe position. Potential complications Scarring in the lower eyelid and consecutive entropion or ectropion may occur, especially in cases with inadequate surgical approach and dissection. Another potential complication is tearing of the lower eyelid, especially in previously operated cases where scarred tissue alters the resilience of the lid. These complications are rare and can be avoided reliably, if dissection is done with sufficient care. Careful dissection is thought to prevent microtrauma to the eye muscles as well as to the orbital tissue. This way extensive fat atrophy hopefully is prevented. Sequelae as binocular diplopia are common in the postoperative inpatient phase due to swelling. Usually diplopia vanishes with decreasing swelling. Blindness of the operated eye is extremely rare and can reliably be avoided with the assistance of modern computer-assisted surgery, patient-specific implants, and sufficient caution by an experienced surgeon. Pearls and pitfalls Removal of previously inserted material might be challenging due to scarring. This can differ significantly depending on the used shape and type of material. Scar tissue passes through implant fenestrations and needs to be dissected sharp, which is especially challenging close to structures at risk. The investigators always test free eye motility through a Forced Duction Test before implant insertion (as comparative value) and after the insertion as ensurement that no orbital tissue is entrapped. Another challenge is the correct estimation of the orbital target volume. Patient-specific implants are thought to ensure a less traumatic orbital reconstruction, a reconstruction that is furthermore in line with preoperative planning. However, intraoperative adaptation is limited. Some studies recommend inserting autogenous bone for correction of orbital volume loss; to the authors’ experience, this type of volume contouring is not permanent due to resorption. Titanium blocks in turn may be challenging and difficult to place. In their opinion, thorough preoperative planning of a correct target volume and anatomic shape by an experienced team for planning and surgery constitutes the best solution for achieving optimal results. Immediate postoperative care After awaking from general anesthesia, visual acuity, pupil function, eye motility, and binocular diplopia are checked by the surgeon. These functions are subsequently checked every hour within the first 24 hours, in order to avoid optical neuropathy due to an orbital compression. Patients are advised not to blow the nose and be open mouthed when sneezing. In cases of foreign body feeling or pronounced chemosis, eye drops (ie, combination of tobramycin and dexamethasone or carbomer) is administered. In general, an elevated upper body and a cooling device is recommended. As an additional preventive measure kinesiologic taping may be administered, which reduces swelling and tissue sagging. A perioperative antibiotic therapy, oral or intravenous for 5 days, is pursued. Rehabilitation and recovery Swelling subsides mostly in the first few days to the first 2 weeks at the latest. During this period diplopia may arise or increase in intensity and patients should be well educated. Conclusive clinical assessments of postoperative results, especially when extensive secondary reconstruction was performed, are feasible often after several weeks or even months. During a complex postoperative course, interdisciplinary support (ie, ophthalmology) may accelerate the healing process. Clinical results in the literature Latest literature on secondary orbital repair is sparse ( Table 1 ). Many studies use digital planning and intraoperative quality control; differences exist mainly in selection of reconstruction material. Frequent indications for secondary orbital reconstruction are globe malposition, diplopia, and impaired eye motility. Surgical outcomes regarding enophthalmos reduction are in general good, certainly with the help of navigation and patient-specific implants. Table 1 Clinical results in the literature Study Design Time Posttrauma or Primary Surgery Cases Indication Cause Reconstruction Material Surgical Assisting Methods Complications Conclusions Baumann 2015 Retrospective n.a. 6 Orbital deformity & at least 2-wall defect 5 trauma 4 PEEK Preoperative CT 1 local infection PEEK Navigation and CAD/CAM-workflow facilitate late & secondary orbital correction 1 tumor 2 PSI (titanium) Preoperative virtual orbit reconstruction 1 skin perforation in radiated patient CAD/CAM design implants Intraoperative navigation Park 2016 Retrospective 7 months 16 Enophthalmos Trauma Porous polyethylene implants Preoperative CT No improvement of eye motility in 2 patients Reconstruction of posterior margin and floor slope as a key point in prevention of enophthalmos Impaired eye motility Endoscopic assistance Recommendation of slight exophthalmos at end of surgery Nkenke 2011 Prospective 6 months 20 Enophthalmos Trauma Glass-bioceramic Preoperative CT Intraoperative correction of designed implants necessary Improvement globe position in both groups Nonpreformed titanium mesh Preoperative virtual orbit reconstruction High costs & fabrication time as drawbacks of designed implants 10 CAD/CAM design implants 10 intraoperative formed titanium implants Kim 2016 Retrospective 2 d up to 11 y 13 Globe malpositioning Trauma Majority porous polyethylene-coated titanium mesh Preoperative CT Postoperative mydriasis in 1 patient Improvement globe position, eye motility & patient satisfaction Entrapped orbital tissue Residual diplopia in 3 patients Abbreviations: CAD/CAM, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing; n.a., not applicable; PEEK, polyetheretherketone; PSI, patient-specific implant. Summary Indications for secondary orbital corrections are enophthalmos larger than 2 mm, impaired eye motility, and binocular diplopia due to incorrect implant placement or possible tissue entrapment. Late and secondary orbital reconstructions are more demanding than primary reconstruction cases due to altered anatomic landmarks and late soft tissue changes. In addition to the primary reconstruction workflow with mirroring and virtual reconstruction of the fractured orbit, volume corrections may be necessary in order to prevent globe malposition. Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose.

Related Articles

Leave A Comment?

You must be logged in to post a comment.